Sarbanes-Oxley Fifth Anniversary Marked by Problems
Sarbanes-Oxley - Big Cost, Little Benefit
AddThis Social Bookmark Button Email This Print This

Washington, D.C., July 25, 2007 Tuesday,— July 31st is the fifth anniversary of President Bush's signing of the Sarbanes-Oxley bill aimed at protecting investors from corporate abuses. Unfortunately, the law has resulted in harm to investors, preventing them from growing wealth.

A recent report by the Competitive Enterprise Institute, SOXing It to the Little Guy: How Sarbanes-Oxley Hurts Small Investors and Entrepreneurs, identifies major flaws in the law and explains why the law must be overhauled completely. Among the problems with Sarbanes-Oxley identified in the report:

  • Section 404, the law’s most costly provision. "Section 404 forces auditors and executives to sign off not only on the accuracy of a company’s financial statements, but also on its ‘internal controls,’ a vague term which the law does not define," Berlau explains.
  • Section 301 is another problem. It "mandates the one-size-fits-all requirements that only ‘independent’ directors sit on companies’ audit committees, intruding on the cohesiveness and efficiency of different types of boards."
  • Section 201 "prohibits a company’s auditor from performing any other services for the firm,” a prohibition which has “caused costly duplication of many accounting tasks."

The author, John Berlau, Director of CEI’s Center for Entrepreneurship, proposes an alternative stock venue that is free of Sarbanes-Oxley and other SEC requirements, in which fraud would still be punished but investors could choose how many preexisting rules are necessary.


AddThis Social Bookmark Button Email This Print This