Agriculture
  • subhead: 
    Good for Special Interests, Bad for Consumers and Taxpayers

    Washington, D.C., December 14, 2007—Yesterday the Senate passed the 2007 farm bill, the first major revision of agricultural policy in five years. "The $286 billion Senate version of the Farm Bill is a good deal for farmers, but a shabby one for taxpayers who foot the bill for this Congressional largesse," said Competitive Enterprise Institute Adjunct Fellow Fran Smith.

  • subhead: 
    New Video Highlights Excesses of Agricultural Pork

    Washington, D.C., November 2, 2007—As Congress is poised to approve a new farm bill that further burdens consumers, taxpayers, and the poor while paying for bloated farm subsidies, the Competitive Enterprise Institute is calling for reform in a new video: "Farming for Dollars: How Farm Subsidies Hurt Consumers, Taxpayers, and the Poor."

  • subhead: 
    A Case Study in the Law of Unintended Consequences
    legacy_type_id: 
    25
    legacy_article_id: 
    5976

    A boom in ethanol production is taking place today for variety of reasons. Undoubtedly, the most significant factor is government support and subsidies for biofuel production. The rationale for subsiding biofuels arises from a convergence of security, environmental, and nationalistic concerns, which has led policy makers to endorse stiffer mandates and increased subsidies.