Fairness Doctrine, Wind Power and Flood Insurance
July 25, 2008
Online Gambling, Fannie Mae Bailout and WTO
July 24, 2008
Satellite Radio, Mortgage Bailout and Union Organizing
July 23, 2008
Advocates of the new listing claim that to remove the bears from their threatened status, the federal government must first enact restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions, which will then, it is imagined, influence the global climate to such an extent as to stop shifts in Arctic ice cover. Listing the bear will enable activist groups to use litigation to force the nation into a regulatory nightmare of limits on energy use.
“We regret the listing,” said Competitive Enterprise Institute Director of Energy & Global Warming Policy Myron Ebell. “We don’t think putting ‘high bars’ on it will work. We hope there will be immediate litigation to challenge the listing on procedural and substantive grounds.”
Today’s
listing does require a “high bar” for evidence that particular greenhouse gas
sources are causing actual harm to a particular population of polar bears. But “the ‘high bar’ just delays the day when
global warming activists will be able to impose their policy of energy
suppression,” said CEI Senior Fellow
Competitive Enterprise Institute
Senior Fellow Marlo
Lewis submitted lengthy comments last fall on behalf of CEI to the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service detailing the reasons why the polar bear should not be
listed. His comments can be found here.
CEI is a non-profit, non-partisan public policy group dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government. For more information about CEI, please visit our website at www.cei.org.