You are here

CEI Joins Coalition Letter Supporting Open Bidding in Infrastructure Projects

Coalition Letters

Title

CEI Joins Coalition Letter Supporting Open Bidding in Infrastructure Projects

To Members of the U.S. Congress:

As the 115th Congress considers ways to support revitalization of America’s infrastructure, we ask that the free market principles of transparency, competition and cost effectiveness be incorporated into all appropriations or authorization legislation related to infrastructure projects. Specifically, legislation should include language that clearly requires an open, competitive bidding process for materials that will be used in infrastructure projects. 

There is bi-partisan agreement in Congress that the country’s transportation energy and water infrastructure is insufficient, outdated, or in need of repair or replacement. By allowing for an open and competitive bidding process, project managers and engineers will be better able to evaluate different options and select materials for infrastructure projects that enhance performance, durability, and reduce costs to taxpayers.

Much of the federal funds devoted to infrastructure flows from the federal level to state, county, or local agencies and is applied to projects that are managed locally. Within this flow of funds issues of economic inefficiency arise due to the fact that many states, counties, and localities limit or direct which materials can be used in publicly funded infrastructure and construction projects.

These government imposed restrictions on materials in infrastructure and construction projects were often put in place to appease special interests by preventing competition in the bidding process. Alternatively, such restrictions were enacted decades ago when lawmakers could not fathom the advancements and innovations in infrastructure materials that have taken place in recent years. 

These restrictions on competition in the bidding process for publicly funded infrastructure and construction projects prevent new and innovative materials that can prove safer and more efficient from even being considered. In turn the costs of public infrastructure projects can be artificially inflated by outdated materials, wasting billions in taxpayer dollars.

A recent study released by the National Taxpayers Union (NTU) found it would cost $1.32 trillion to replace the nation’s entire aging water infrastructure. It is projected that allowing open competition for materials in just water infrastructure projects could save over $371 billion in taxpayer funds. A separate study conducted by Massachusetts-based BCC Research found removing barriers to competition could save up to 39 percent per mile in pipe costs alone. 

Furthermore, the concept of open competition is not limited solely to energy and water infrastructure, but can be applied to numerous other aspects of publicly funded infrastructure projects that have been limited for decades by protectionist and outdated restrictions on materials.

A modern, strong and efficient infrastructure system is essential to a growing economy. While maintaining and updating infrastructure is both complex and expensive, requiring open competition in infrastructure procurement is a common sense way for members of Congress to fulfill their obligation to act as responsible stewards of taxpayers’ dollars.

We urge you to support requiring open, competitive bidding procedures for all materials in government funded infrastructure grant programs and procurement processes in future appropriations and infrastructure legislation. 

Sincerely,

Grover G. Norquist                                        
Americans for Tax Reform                                              

David Williams                                                
Taxpayers Protection Alliance                               

James L. Martin                                              
60 Plus Association                                            

Dick Patten                                                     
American Business Defense Council                        

Steve Pociask                                                  
American Consumer Institute Center for Citizen Research                           

Jon Russell                                                      
American City County Exchange                          

Christine Harbin                                             
Americans for Prosperity                                        

Lisa B. Nelson                                                            
American Legislative Exchange Council                 

Ashley N. Varner                                                                    
ALEC Action                                                 
           

Andrew F. Quinlan                                         
Center for Freedom and Prosperity                         

Chuck Muth
Citizen Outreach

Marc Scribner 
Competitive Enterprise Institute

Tom Schatz
Council for Citizens Against Government Waste

Adam Brandon
Freedom Works

George C. Landrith
Frontiers of Freedom

Carrie Lucas
Independent Women’s Forum

Heather Higgins
Independent Women’s Voice

Willes K. Lee
National Federation of Republican Assemblies

Brandon Arnold
National Taxpayers Union

Kevin Kosar   
R Street Institute

Judson Phillips
Tea Party Nation