CEI Weekly: EPA’s Utility MACT Is All Pain, No Gain

FEATURE: EPA’s Utility MACT Is All Pain, No Gain

The Senate is soon to vote on whether to overturn the EPA’s Utility MACT, which imposes costly new mercury regulations for coal-fired power plants. The EPA claims the regulations will protect the health of unborn children; but is that true? In a new study, CEI analysts Marlo Lewis, William Yeatman, and David Bier discuss the dubious benefits—and high costs–of the EPA’s Utility MACT. Read the study, All Pain and No Gain: The Illusory Benefits of the Utility MACT, here. Also, see:

>> Press release about the study

>> Marlo Lewis’ op-ed in Forbes, “Big Costs, Illusory Benefits: Why Congress Should Nix the Utility MACT”

>> William Yeatman’s “The Case Against EPA’s Utility MACT (in pictures)”

>> David Bier’s op-ed in The Washington Examiner, “EPA’s Phony Job Numbers”

 

SHAPING THE DEBATE

Obama’s War on Resource Industries

Myron Ebell’s op-ed in The Charleston Daily Mail

 

The Gathering Storm: Bracing for the Looming Euro Debacle

Bill Frezza’s column in Forbes

 

H.R. 1909 Lifts Barriers to Small Loans

John Berlau’s op-ed in NewsMax

 

Should We Label Genetically-Modified Food?

Greg Conko’s interview on Minnesota Public Radio

 

Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act Podcast

Ryan Radia’s podcast debate for the Federalist Society

 

Obama Shouldn’t Embellish His Small Business Record

Wayne Crews’ citation in Bloomberg Businessweek

 

Mancin, Republicans Fight Mercury Emission Rule

CEI’s citation on WVNSTV

 

DoJ May Put Kibosh on Cable Cos.’ Data Caps

Ryan Radia’s citation in E-Commerce Times

 

CEI PODCAST

June 13, 2012: Smarter Transportation Funding

When the federal government gives out transportation funding to the states, they attach a lot of strings. The solution, according to Land-use and Transportation Policy Analyst Marc Scribner, is to get the federal government out of the transportation business and devolve it to the states. In the just-released CEI study “Fixing Surface Transportation in Massachusetts: A Path Forward under a Devolved Federal Funding Scenario,” Scribner argues that by following a user-pays, user-benefits principle, states can raise revenue and maintain infrastructure more efficiently than the federal government can.

 

BEST OF THE BLOGS

Remembering Elinor Ostrom

By Fred Smith

 

Jamie Dimon and the ‘Just Fine’ Private Sector

By John Berlau

 

China Takes Hard Stance on EU’s Airline Emissions Charges

By Fran Smith

 

Legislators Seek to Create New, Unnecessary Protected Class: Gun Owners

By Hans Bader