You are here

OpenMarket: Energy and Environment

  • Look Out for Hurricane Fred

    December 7, 2006
    Our fearless leader, Fred Smith, is on the road again, spreading the good news of free markets and limited government. Yesterday he spoke to a student audience at Furman University, hosted by the campus group Conservative Students for a Better Tomorrow.
    Fred engaged the audience on "The Politics of Climate Change," and the kids were nice enough to thank him with a lovely framed watercolor of what I assume is the campus and its surrounding area in Greenville, South Carolina. And they say the youth of today have no manners.
  • Let Them Use Solar

    December 7, 2006
    It's a heart-warming ad, literally. A poverty-striken mother and daughter sit freezing in their unheated home in the dead of winter, trying to warm themselves with a small cooking stove. But then a fuel truck pulls up and a band of smiling deliverymen pile out and fill up the family's oil tank. Now they'll be warm. The tagline, if I remember it correctly from when I saw the tv spot earlier this week, is “low-cost oil for those in need, brought to you by the good people of Venezuela and Citizens Energy.” Now there's been quite a bit of controversy over Hugo Chavez's program to distribute discount-priced oil to the needy in this country. But I've got a question about...
  • To Play the King

    December 6, 2006
    Prince Charles has decided his staff should bicycle everywhere and that he himself should practice what he preaches, up to a point:
    Although aides have been looking into his catching an ordinary commuter train from Kemble station, near his Highgrove estate, Gloucs, they said yesterday that he was yet to use it. Travelling by public transport would the most environmentally-friendly mode for the prince, who has said it was his desire to reduce carbon emissions — and not his advancing years — that led to his decision to give up playing polo, because time restrictions forced him to catch a helicopter to games. But, inevitably, there are security issues. A first-class carriage would have to be sealed off and guarded. Royal accounts show that it...
  • Oreskes Confusion

    December 5, 2006
    Appearing on "Oprah," Al Gore cited a review of the climate change literature by Dr. Naomi Oreskes of the University of California as the last word on an alleged global warming "consensus." But, as CEI's Ian Murray notes, the Oreskes study is far from authoritative:
    On the supposed “scientific consensus”: Dr. Naomi Oreskes, of the University of California, San Diego, (p. 262) did not examine a “large random sample” of scientific articles. She got her search terms wrong and thought she was looking at all the articles when in fact she was looking at only 928 out of about 12,000 articles on “climate change.” Dr. Benny Peiser, of Liverpool John Moores University in England, was unable to replicate her study. He says, “As I have...
  • The Science of 'Deathenol'

    December 4, 2006
    The Internet Skeptic ("Critical Analysis of Today's Headlines") emails today about some of his recent YouTube videos. One that caught my eye was the analysis of the science of ethanol production and use. This, of course, complements the analysis of the impact of ethanol production by Dennis Avery that we published in September. [youtube]znnAW_wugp4[/youtube]
  • Today's must-read

    December 4, 2006
    A must-read is today's lead editorial in The Wall Street Journal (free subscription required) — “Global Warming Gag Order — Senators to Exxon: Shut up, and pay up.” It hits Senators Snowe and Rockefeller's letter to ExxonMobil telling the oil company to stop funding “global warming deniers” like CEI, which almost single-handedly has kept climate change proposals from being enacted. We particularly like these words from the editorial:
    “We respect the folks at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, but we didn't know until reading the Rockefeller-Snowe letter that they ran U.S. climate policy and led the mainstream media around by the nose, too. Congratulations. “Let's compare the balance of forces: on one side, CEI; on the other, the Pew Charitable Trusts, the...
  • The Global Warming Case--the cataclysm question

    November 30, 2006
    One comment from yesterday's Supreme Court hearing that's getting a lot of press is Justice Scalia's question to the attorney for the petitioning states about the imminence of harm to the states: "I mean, when is the predicted cataclysm?" The attorney answered: "The harm does not suddenly spring up in the year 2100; it plays out continuously over time." I suspect that this exchange will be portrayed, by some, as illustrating the gap between the scientifically uneducated and the scientifically erudite. After all, Justice Scalia himself later noted that he's "not a scientist", whereas counsel for the petitioning states was probably quite familiar with the underlying science. But later in the argument that attorney said: "... our harm is imminent in the sense that lighting a fuse on a bomb is imminent harm ...." That sounds pretty cataclysmic to me. If you're delving...
  • Global Warming Hearings & Hurricanes

    November 30, 2006
    Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in the global warming case. Today is the last day of the 2006 hurricane season, the quietest in the a decade. Personally, I hope the Supreme Court's ruling in the case ends up being as disappointing to global warming alarmists as this year's hurricane season has been. Of course, one quiet hurricane season doesn't disprove the alarmist forecasts. On the other hand, Katrina didn't support those apocalyptic forecasts either, but you didn't see much in the way of forecasting restraint on the part of alarmists last year. I'd like to correct a few points that were garbled when I first phoned them in soon after yesterday's court hearing. The post below states that EPA was hammered by some justices "talking about issues that weren't...
  • Those clever Malthusians

    November 29, 2006
    There's an op/ed in the New York Times today that essentially claims that Malthus was right and that Julian Simon just got lucky when he made his famous bet with Paul Ehrlich and his doomsinging colleagues. John Whitehead of the Environmental Economics blog has a perceptive comment:
    Increases in energy prices, with the energy return on investment (EROI -- a new term for me that showed up in the comments section on this blog) falling from 25 to 1 to 15 to 1 over the past 20 years in the oil industry (EROI is 4 to 1 for the Alberta oil sands) used as evidence that the current runup in oil prices is not a blip. The...
  • Supreme Court grills Massachusetts, EPA in global warming case

    November 29, 2006

    CEI General Counsel Sam Kazman is on-site for two important cases being argued at the U.S. Supreme Court today. He phoned in his quick take on the EPA case:

    The first, Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, is a lawsuit brought by a group of state attorneys general, trying to force the EPA to regulate CO2 as a pollutant. The AGs aim to have CO2 emissions reduced and thus impede global warming.

    Massachusetts went first. They got a lot of questions on standing from the justices: the states must show specific harm to themselves (from CO2 emissions) and that the harm would be redressed by the relief sought by the states. I don't think Massachusetts did all too well under questioning. They were getting hammered with questions. An old case called SCRAP (United States v...

Pages

Subscribe to OpenMarket: Energy and Environment