You are here

OpenMarket: Angela Logomasini

  • Indulgences for the Rich and Famous?

    September 30, 2007
    In an appendix titled “What You Can Do” found in their latest book — This Moment on Earth — Senator John Kerry and wife Theresa Heinz Kerry call on their readers to make sacrifices that will reduce mankind's “environmental footprint.”  Like Al Gore, however, they take a pass.  After all, the rich can afford to buy what amounts to indulgences: “Those of us in politics, traveling at times in motorcades, flying on private planes on occasion, you name it…now buy carbon offsets by making a donation to an organization that specializes in carbon neutrality,” they explain.

    The idea that somehow the lifestyles of the rich and famous can buy their morality is really absurd. In fact, the entire concept of offsetting one's personal moral precepts is offensive, especially when those people taking the offsets want to regulate away other people's freedoms. ...
  • OIRA Backs Science

    September 20, 2007
    Cheers to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the White House's Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Yesterday, it released a memorandum to federal agencies regarding standards for risk assessments. Agencies conduct such assessments to determine whether regulations are necessary to address a specific concern and to consider the potential costs and benefits of various regulatory approaches.

    This memorandum offers a much needed response to the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report issued earlier this year on a proposed OMB/OIRA bulletin covering the same topic. NAS suggested that those standards were unsound because they did not...
  • Left Unaccountable

    September 17, 2007
    Activists on the left don't seem to mind expanding bureaucracy and red tape when it hits businesses, consumers, property owners, and taxpayers in general. They support heavy paperwork programs that produce little, if any environmental benefit, like those under the Toxics Release Inventory. They regularly launch lawsuits under the National Environmental Policy Act and the Endangered Species Act to stop construction, logging, and many other private-sector activities, costing taxpayers and small businesses millions. And they fight all efforts to make environmental laws more effective and affordable. Yet when government is required to do a little paperwork, leftists suddenly complain about bureaucracy and call for streamlining.

    In a recent OMB Watch paper of the Data Quality Act, this leftist group complains that industry is...
  • Misguided Green Priorities

    September 12, 2007
    A story in today's Washington Post highlights the fact that with all the news about Chinese toy recalls, regulators are ignoring other, more serious risks. This is a real problem, but it is much larger than the recent problems with China. Environmental health and safety activists focus on politically selected risks — leading everyone else to ignore the more serious ones in many areas. Lately, conservatives have joined in to some extent because they don't like communist China. I share their disdain for communism, but I don't see any reason to jump on the green bandwagon or bash free trade.

    Concern about lead paint in toys is a very big story because the greens have demonized lead exposure at any level. In reality, lead...
  • No Justification for Alarming Rescue Workers

    September 11, 2007
    Today's New York Post reports that a medical center funded by the federal government to research potential health effects of the World Trade Center debris to rescue workers has exaggerated the risks and engaged in scientifically questionable practices. The Post story commends The New York Times for breaking this story last week in a front page story.

    Can't say I am surprised. The center involved is a division of Mount Sinai Medical Center, headed by activist Dr. Philip J. Landrigan.

    Landrigan often works in tandem with environmentalists, who use Mount Sinai research to make all sorts of unfounded claims about the risks of chemicals. This case focuses on research conducted by...
  • "Polluted" Politicians?

    September 10, 2007
    Canadian politicians are worried. News reports say that several politicians had recently given some of their blood to the greens, who examined it for “toxic chemicals.” The greens report that these lawmakers' bodies are “polluted” with all kinds of synthetic chemicals. Among the problem chemicals they identified is bisphenol A.

    So What? These studies are simply political ploys used by environmental activists to inspire fear and thereby bolster their calls for more regulation. For example, there is no evidence that bisphenol A presents any problems at all.

    The human body has always been full of all kinds of chemicals from the environment in minute amounts. Even cavemen had chemicals in their bodies — just...
  • Chinaphobia?

    August 31, 2007
    With all the hype about recalls of Chinese toys, jewelry, and other children's items, consumers — especially parents — in the West are understandably concerned if not downright fearful of Chinese goods. Yet the risks don't match the hype as Brendan O'Neill of Spiked points out very well.

    So what drives the extreme response? O'Neill offers some thought provoking perspectives on other forces that may be at play. He notes:
    Look behind the headlines and it seems that, yes, some toys and various other products from
    China fall short of tough Western safety standards, but they are far from lethal. They're not even particularly toxic. Instead, the ‘toxic toys' drama has become a rather poisonous metaphor for contemporary Western fears of China, of its apparently rapacious economic growth and its...
  • Markets Greener than Green Buidling Lobby

    August 23, 2007
    According to a story in today's Greenwire, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development has conducted a survey showing that people in the real estate industry don't understand the cost-saving benefits of “green building.” Accordingly, the president of the organization concludes: "In order to achieve a step change in energy efficiency in buildings, there is a need for strongly supportive policies and regulatory frameworks."

    Hogwash. If such “green building” was saving money, there would be no need for government regulation and support. It is most likely that real estate professionals shun politically designed “green” building standards because they are foolish or even wasteful. CEI's study on the green building issue shows that, in fact,...
  • Alarming Waste

    August 22, 2007
    Today's Washington Post includes a story on bisphenol A, a chemical that has been used to make flexible, clear plastic products--including baby bottles--since the late 1950s. Numerous studies have found it poses insignificant risks, and no one has ever documented any adverse human health effects. The American Council on Science and Health provides an good overview of the science.

    Yet activist groups continue to hype the issue. In addition, a panel put together by the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Institute of Health, says...
  • DDT Deniers Deny Science

    August 20, 2007
    DDT-deniers—those who would rather let people die that allow DDT use to fight malaria-carrying mosquitoes—have been critiquing our blog posts on the topic lately. Last week they attacked us for highlighting recent scientific research that underscores the value of DDT in repelling mosquitoes. Apparently, they won't even be swayed by scientific data, nor do they want anyone else to be convicted by the facts. But don't be swayed by their hype. Instead, read the op-ed in today's New York Times by Dr. Donald Roberts one of the study's authors. Roberts notes:

    DDT, the miracle insecticide turned environmental bogeyman, is once...


Subscribe to OpenMarket: Posts by Angela Logomasini