Joint Letter To President Bush On The EPA’s Climate Action Report

Dear President Bush,

We write to share our concerns with Climate Action Report 2002, which your administration recently transmitted to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and released to the public by posting on the EPA web site.  As opponents of the Kyoto Protocol and similar domestic proposals to ration energy, we welcome your remarks of June 4 that you had “read the report put out by the bureaucracy” and that you still opposed the Kyoto global warming treaty.  We recognize that your principled opposition to Kyoto has come at considerable political cost, and we admire your resolution in the face of continuing environmental alarmism.

Climate Action Report 2002 is largely a compilation and summary of junk science produced by the Clinton-Gore Administration in order to support their Kyoto agenda.  In particular, crucial parts of the report rely on the discredited National Assessment on the impacts of climate change, which your administration stated on September 6, 2001 was “not policy positions or official statements of the U. S. government,” as part of a settlement of a lawsuit brought by three members of Congress and several of the organizations signing this letter.  In addition, the report clearly does not comply with the requirements of the Data Quality Act.

In our view, Climate Action Report 2002 undermines your position on the Kyoto Protocol and damages efforts in the Congress to advance your energy policies and to oppose environmental policies that would implement Kyoto-style controls on energy use.  We do not believe that these negative effects will go away merely by ignoring the report.

We therefore urge you to withdraw Climate Action Report 2002 immediately and to direct that it be re-written on the basis of sound science and without relying on discredited products of the previous administration.  As production and release of this report demonstrates, pursuing your global warming and energy policies effectively will not be possible as long as key members of your administration do not fully support your policies.  We therefore also urge you to dismiss or re-assign all administration employees who are not pursuing your agenda, just as you have done in several similar instances.

Thank you for your attention to our concerns.  We stand ready to work with you and your administration on pro-consumer, pro-taxpayer policies.

Yours sincerely,

Fred Smith and Myron Ebell

Competitive Enterprise Institute


Paul Beckner

Citizens for a Sound Economy


Frances B. Smith

Consumer Alert


Kenneth Green

Reason Foundation


David Rothbard

Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow


Karen Kerrigan

Small Business Survival Committee


Thomas A. Schatz

Citizens Against Government Waste


Grover Norquist

Americans for Tax Reform


Tom DeWeese

American Policy Center


Steve Hayward

Pacific Research Institute


George C. Landrith

Frontiers of Freedom


Patrick Michaels

Cato Institute


S. Fred Singer

Science & Environmental Policy Project


Lori Waters

Eagle Forum


Morton C. Blackwell

Conservative Leadership PAC


Paul Driessen

Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise


Paul M. Weyrich

Free Congress Foundation


John Berthoud

National Taxpayers Union


David A. Keene

American Conservative Union


Eric Licht

Coalitions for America


Lewis K. Uhler

National Tax Limitation Committee


C. Preston Noell, III

Tradition, Family, Property, Inc.


Ron Pearson

Council for America


Gary L. Bauer

American Values


Robert A. Schadler

Center for First Principles


Jefferey S. Taylor

Free Republic Network


Richard LessnerAmerican Renewal


Michael Hardiman

American Land Rights Association


Kevin L. Kearns

U. S. Business and Industry Council


William J. Murray

Government Is Not God


Benjamin C. Works



F. Patricia Callahan

American Association of Small Property Owners