CEI leads a Coalition Letter to End CFTC Red Tape Prediction Markets

Dear Acting Chair Pham and Commissioner Johnson: As leaders of conservative and free-market groups, we believe that government should not stand in the way of innovative information services. We watched with interest the solid performance of prediction markets in forecasting the results of the 2024 presidential election, and noted the contrast with the lackluster performance of legacy media polls.

We believe this performance shows there is potential for prediction markets to disseminate practical information to Americans on political, cultural and economic trends that can help them better plan their futures. Therefore, we ask that in contrast to the CFTC under the Biden administration, the CFTC in this new administration adopt a policy of permissionless innovation toward prediction market venues.

The Biden administration CFTC pursued weaponized regulation against prediction market venues, even attempting to ban an election market exchange that had been approved by the CFTC under the Obama administration back in 2014. Fortunately, this and other attempts to ban prediction markets were thwarted by federal courts that correctly found the CFTC had exceeded the law. But we believe that to fully reverse the Biden CFTC’s damage, the CFTC must affirm now that prediction markets dealing with elections and other current events are allowable as futures trading venues under federal law.

We agree with Brian Qunitenz – former CFTC Commissioner and President Trump’s current nominee for Chair of the CFTC – that event contracts offered by prediction markets are almost always permissible commodity futures under the federal Commodities Exchange Act, as they are “occurrence[s]” that are “both beyond the control of the relevant parties to the contract…and

associated with a financial, commercial, or economic consequence.” As in traditional futures exchanges, prices of contracts on prediction markets are set by buyers and sellers. This makes prediction markets fundamentally different from casinos, in which customers bet against a “house” that has incentives to tilt odds to its favor.

We note that another similarity to traditional futures exchanges is prediction markets’ ability to enable individuals and businesses to hedge risks. Election results impact businesses large and small, and prediction markets allow small firms to hedge election results just as large

corporations do with expensive and complex derivatives. Similarly, regarding sports outcome contracts increasingly being offered by prediction markets, small firms affected by the performance of a team in a game or a season can buy prediction market contracts to manage effects on their sales of sports-related products or services. As Quintenz notes, “contracts relating to the outcome of sporting events could now have a legitimate economic and hedging purpose for businesses.”

We also of course believe that the CFTC should not hesitate to punish fraud or other infractions from prediction markets, just as it does when traditional futures markets run afoul of the law. We therefore respectfully request that the CFTC issue a policy statement stating two things. First, that event contracts offered on prediction markets are subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the CFTC. And second, that the CFTC will police behavior of prediction market venues but will not restrict the subject matter of the event contracts offered by the venues. We thank you for consideration of our views.

Sincerely,

John Berlau

Director of Finance Policy

Competitive Enterprise Institute

Grover Norquist

President

Americans for Tax Reform

James Erwin

Interim Director

Shareholder Advocacy Forum

James L. Martin

Founder/Chairman

60 Plus Association

Saulius “Saul” Anuzis

President

American Association of Senior Citizens

Phil Kerpen

President

American Commitment

Robert Romano

Executive Director

Americans for Limited Government

Brian Garst

Vice President

Center for Freedom and Prosperity

Daniel Mitchell

President

Center for Freedom and Prosperity

Jeffrey Mazzella

President

Center for Individual Freedom

Ryan Ellis

President

Center for a Free Economy

Ashley Baker

Executive Director

The Committee for Justice

George Landrith

President

Frontiers of Freedom

Andrew Langer

President

Institute for Liberty

Charles Sauer

President

Market Institute

Patrick M. Brenner

President

Southwest Public Policy Institute