EPA Poised to Issue Global Warming ‘Endangerment’ Finding

EPA Poised to Issue Global Warming ‘Endangerment’ Finding
“Finding would trigger economy-chilling regulatory cascade”

Washington, D.C., April 15, 2009—A major ruling on the health and welfare implications of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions is expected from the Obama Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday.  The ruling – called an “endangerment finding” – would compel EPA to establish greenhouse gas emission standards for new motor vehicles.

“The endangerment finding will set the stage for an economic train wreck and a constitutional crisis,” warned eight free-market groups in an April 15 letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson.

Establishing greenhouse gas emission standards for new motor vehicles will make an estimated 1.2 million previously unregulated entities (office buildings, big box stores, even commercial kitchens) vulnerable to new controls, paperwork, penalties, and litigation. “A more potent Anti-Stimulus Package would be difficult to imagine,” said CEI Senior Fellow Marlo Lewis.

“Once EPA pushes the start button, the logic of the law takes over, obligating EPA to regulate in very intrusive and heavy-handed ways,” said Lewis.  To contain the economic fallout from an endangerment finding, EPA would have to play lawmaker and amend the Clean Air Act, violating the separation of powers. Yet allowing the statutory logic to unfold would impose regulatory burdens never approved by Congress. “Either option flouts basic precepts of our constitutional system,” said Lewis.

“If EPA issues an endangerment finding, the Administration will bear responsibility for any increase in consumer energy costs, unemployment, and GDP losses resulting from [Clean Air Act] regulation of CO2,” the letter warned.

The likely EPA ruling responds to Mass. v. EPA, which held that greenhouse gases fall within regulatory purview of the Clean Air Act.  But the Supreme Court also said that EPA does not have to issue an endangerment finding if it provides statutory reasons why it cannot or will not make such a determination.

Normal
0

false
false
false

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

Normal
0

false
false
false

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }

st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}