Climate change is not a hoax, but as a political matter, it is a persistent pretext for expanding government control over the economy, redistributing wealth, and empowering unaccountable elites at the expense of voters and their elected representatives.

There is also the constant conflating of climate policy with climate science in order to make subjective and ideological policy choices seem as if the science dictates those choices. But science informs policy, it does not provide objective answers to policy questions. However, those who disagree with the climate policy choices favored by extremists are labeled with offensive terms like deniers.

The Competitive Enterprise Institute rejects climate policies that assume Americans and humans all over the world must sacrifice their quality of living, be guilted into radical life changes, and give up on improving their standard of living in the name of fighting climate change. Even if the United States no longer existed, there would be little to no meaningful impact on global temperatures. Therefore, the myriad of extreme policies are all costs and no gain.

Using the force of government to impose policies that severely hurt humans today, especially the poor, without any meaningful benefits is not just foolish but indefensible. And when such policies are advanced, the proponents of those policies should always be expected to explain how their policy choices would meaningfully affect global temperatures. When they are unable to provide answers, which will be the case, their policy choices should be quickly dismissed.

The best way to deal with any genuine climate concerns is to remove government obstacles that hinder innovation, reduce wealth, and undermine prosperity and opportunity. Economic liberty benefits Americans generally, and at the same time, it is also the world’s best climate policy. After all, the wealthiest and most prosperous nations are far more likely to develop solutions to such problems than other nations.

Featured Posts

Search Posts

Newsletter

Vol. VI, No. 7

Politics Alberta to Propose Kyoto Alternative   The province of Alberta, Canada will propose a greenhouse gas reduction plan as an alternative…

Climate

Newsletter

Vol. VI, No. 6

Politics Japan Decides to Ratify, but Compliance is Doubtful   Japanese government ministers agreed at a March 19 meeting on a ten-year…

Climate

Newsletter

Vol. VI, No. 5

Politics European Union Agrees to Ratify Kyoto   The European Union’s environment ministers agreed on March 4 to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. …

Climate

Newsletter

Vol. VI, No. 4

Politics   Bush Offers Lukewarm Plan   President George W. Bush outlined his Global Climate Change and Clear Skies Initiatives in…

Climate

Op-Eds

Fools Rush In

The Council of Economic Advisors (CEA) just issued its annual “Economic Report of the President,” including a chapter on environmental policy. The report's language sent…

Climate

Newsletter

Vol. VI, No. 3

Politics<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = “urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office” />   Bush Administration Tip-Toeing Toward New Policies   The New…

Climate

Op-Eds

Rush Hour

In a June 11 Rose Garden speech, President George W. Bush detailed his plan to address the perceived threat of man-made global warming. Wisely, the…

Climate

Newsletter

Vol. VI, No. 2

Politics    Enron Fallout Hits Global Warming    Enron Corporation’s spectacular downfall has begun to affect the ongoing debate over U.S. global warming…

Climate

Newsletter

Vol. VI, No. 1

Politics   Japan Gets Cold Feet   Japan, the host of the 1997 negotiations that culminated in the Kyoto Protocol, may now…

Climate

Newsletter

Vol. V, No. 26

Politics Bush Administration Searches for Alternatives to Kyoto The Bush Administration is actively seeking an alternative strategy to the…

Climate

Newsletter

Vol. V, No. 25

Politics<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = “urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office” />   Administration Considering Climate Policies   After a delay caused…

Climate

Newsletter

Vol. 5, No. 24

Politics<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = “urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office” />   Canadian Government Split on Kyoto   Dissension over whether to…

Climate

Newsletter

Vol. V, No. 23

Politics<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = “urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office” />   The WTO and Kyoto   While Kyoto watchers have…

Climate

Newsletter

Vol. V, No. 22

Politics<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = “urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office” />   Will Anything Happen in Marrakesh?   New episodes of…

Climate

Newsletter

Vol. 5, No. 20

Politics Politics   EU Bows to Industry Pressure   The European Union has been devising an emissions trading scheme to…

Climate

Newsletter

Vol. V, No. 19

Politics Politics   State Department Criticizes TAR   The U.S. State Department has submitted formal comments criticizing the draft Synthesis…

Climate

Newsletter

Vol. V, No. 18

Politics Politics   Senators, Utilities, and Environmentalists To Hold Closed-Door Meetings   Electric utility executives and environmentalists are set to…

Climate

Newsletter

Vol. V, No. 17

Politics Politics   Bush Team Developing Kyoto Alternatives   The Bush Administration is in the process of developing…

Climate

Newsletter

Vol. V, No. 16

Finally someone has brought the climate change debate back down to earth Politics   House Passes Energy Bill  …

Climate

Newsletter

Vol. V, No. 15

Finally someone has brought the climate change debate back down to earth Politics   Triumph in Bonn?  Or Not!  …

Climate

Sam Kazman

Counsel Emeritus

  • Antitrust
  • Automobiles and Roads
  • Banking and Finance

Marlo Lewis, Jr.

Senior Fellow

  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Energy and Environment

Ben Lieberman

Senior Fellow

  • Climate
  • Consumer Freedom
  • Energy

Jacob Tomasulo

Policy Analyst

  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Energy and Environment

Kevin D. Williamson

Writer in Residence

  • Climate
  • Energy and Environment