September 11, 2006 3:25 PM
One of the most important questions in the global warming
debate is how modern changes in observed average temperatures compare to previous,
documented changes in global climate. Next week, that question will be at the
center of a congressional staff briefing to be hosted by the Center for Science & Public Policy
at Frontiers of Freedom:
Climate has naturally changed for
over 4 billion years, warmer and colder, over many time scales. It continues to
change. The question is whether or not humans have significant effect on the
rates and amplitude of change. The null hypothesis is that current changes do
not exceed those of the recent or geological past. Dr. Lee C. Gerhard will
examine past climate change history, human effects, and natural process
September 11, 2006 3:08 PM
“The purpose of the petition is to ensure that U.S.
investors in certain foreign companies have the same opportunities to
participate in corporate governance as the shareholders of domestic companies
already enjoy under SEC rules,” said Action Fund Management's Steve Milloy. “U.S. investors
should not be relegated by their government to second-class status.”
Although this rule is long past due given the increasing
involvement of foreign corporations in U.S. domestic affairs, we call this
the â€˜BP rule,'” said AFM's Tom Borelli. “...
September 11, 2006 2:51 PM
Having solved all other problems on their agenda, the House
voted bravely last week (263-146) to ban the slaughter of horses for
meat. It was not immediately clear why horses exist on a more exalted plane
than, say, cows and pigs, or why the assumed preferences of U.S. consumers
should keep farmers from exporting meat to Europe and
Japan, where it's very much in demand.
September 7, 2006 10:01 PM
This Tuesday, September 12, I will be moderating an America's Future Foundation panel on Latin America, here in D.C. At issue: Is the region turning sharply left, as the rise of Hugo Chavez seemed to indicate, or do other events, such as the elections in Mexico and Peru in which the far Left lost, portend different trends? The event will be at 6:30 pm, at The Fund for American Studies, 1706 New Hampshire Ave, NW. To RSVP or for more information, go here.
September 7, 2006 3:53 PM
It's a thankless task keeping up with the Ozymandian
agglomeration of bureaucracy that is the United Nations, so it's merciful that
our friends at the International Policy Network are following the most recent
developments in UN “programme” development for us. This week the UN Fund for
Population Activities released a report on “Women and International Migration.”
IPN naturally responded with a simple and direct policy recommendation:
eliminate the agency.
From the press release:
When the UNFPA was established in 1979, it was charged
with reducing population growth in order to prevent the spectre of
September 7, 2006 3:32 PM
Despite recent good news on the oil front, some people are still upset with current energy prices. Louisiana oilman Steve Jordan has even decided to open a new field under his swimming pool. Like we at CEI, Mr. Jordan thinks the U.S. government should open up more domestic locations to energy exploration. We wish him the best of luck recouping his $2 million investment in equipment.
September 6, 2006 4:51 PM
When it comes to regulatory policy, it seems that among the
few voices of reason in the Europe today is an American. In today's Wall
Street Journal Europe, U.S. Ambassador to the EU, C. Boyden Gray, has outlined
the inanity of the proposed chemicals policy—the so called REACH policy—that
European legislators are expected to pass into law before the new year.
REACH is the acronym for the appropriately bureaucratic name
of the policy: Registration, Evaluation, and Authorization, of Chemicals.
Yes—believe it or not—some companies will undergo that many
bureaucratic steps before doing business in Europe. The program is based
on the precautionary principle, which demands that firms prove their products
safe before introducing them into commerce—a standard that is impossible to
meet. The result is will likely...
August 15, 2006 9:53 AM
Guess what — a new poll shows that the Seven Dwarfs are better known in the U.S. than the Supreme Court Justices. According to the Reuters article, “Three quarters of Americans can correctly identify two of Show White's seven dwarfs while only a quarter can name two Supreme Court Justices.”
The poll, conducted by Zogby International, also showed that 57 percent of Americans could name Harry Potter as the hero of J.K. Rowling's novels, but only 50 percent could identify the UK's prime minister as Tony Blair.
Is this a case of “rational ignorance,” as CEI's president Fred Smith describes it?
“People have few reasons...
July 28, 2006 9:51 AM
Two hours and 12 minutes of subsidy-sucking. Those people wanted money for everything. Old programs and new programs and more money for all of them, and full federal funding for every possible "conservation" program.
The worst was Pheasants Forever, which is supposedly a "private" conservation group. They are supposed to be doing this stuff privately. That's their mission. Now, they act like they're just another arm of the Federal government.
The guy from the OK Conservation Districts was the best. His line, essentially, was “We got lots of programs and lots of
money in 2002 Farm Bill; let's make those work first We don't need a whole flood of new stuff. There's such a plethora of confusing and possibly conflicting programs out there that lots of folks don't even know what's there.”
Most interesting theme was that ring-necked Pheasants ran through...
July 25, 2006 1:40 PM
Contrary to the network neutrality agenda presented in this Newsforge
article by some anonymous individual going by the name of James Glass,
there is no such thing as one network that is suitable for all the disparate
functions that are increasingly being demanded today (porn, national defense,
financial transactions, massive uploaded video, kid-friendly environments,
secure video-conferencing, etc.) Future, wealthier, generations will
"surf" networks--not sites on a network. Think of them as "Splinternets"
rather than just the "capital-I" Internet.
There are good reasons for wireless phone networks to
exclude all the services noted below by Glass-not-his-real-name; the cell
network couldn't function otherwise; it'd be as polluted as Kazaa and